Swegn Godwineson, Evil or Tragic?

November 17th, 2011 by Mercedes Rochelle | Filed under The Sons of Godwine.

Swegn was the eldest son of a prolific family.  His father, Godwine of Wessex, worked his way up from relative obscurity to the most powerful Earl in the country.  Swegn’s future could have been assured if only he had behaved himself and not acted like a rogue and an outlaw.  He was the only one of his brood who seemed totally evil from the first.  What happened?

We know very little beside the basic events which look very bad indeed.  Initially Swegn held an important earldom which included Herefordshire, Gloucestershire, Oxfordshire, and Somerset.  In 1046, as he was returning from a successful expedition into Wales, he is said to have abducted the abbess of Leominster, had his way with her then sent her back in disgrace.  For this deed he was exiled and lost his earldom.

Swegn eventually submitted to the King and asked to be restored his lands.  At first Edward agreed, but Harold and cousin Beorn, who were given parts of Swegn’s divided earldom, refused to turn over their possessions.  King Edward decided to accept their refusal and gave Swegn four days safe conduct back to his ships.

At the same time, England was threatened by a Danish fleet; there was a lot of back and forth as Godwine and family moved their ships to defend the Kentish coast.  Threatened by severe weather, Swegn anchored off Pevensey where Beorn was waiting.  Apparently calling on their kinship, Swegn persuaded Beorn to return to their home base at Bosham, from whence they would continue to King Edward at Sandwich.

Poor Beorn never made it to Sandwich.  Once at Bosham, he was seized, bound and thrown into a rowboat, taken to Dartmouth and murdered aboard one of Swegn’s longships.  Declared nithing (or worthless) by king and countrymen, Swegn was deserted by his own men and took refuge once again in Flanders.

Amazingly, the next year he was reinstated in his old earldom, then is seen accompanying Godwine during his Exile in 1051 (after himself being exiled again for unspecified reasons).  Godwine and family went back to Flanders once again, but Swegn, overcome with remorse, continued to Jerusalem on a pilgrimage from which he never returned. 

It’s easy to dismiss Swegn as the black sheep of the family.  But perhaps his story goes a little deeper than that.  First of all, consider the circumstances of Godwine and Gytha’s marriage.  King Canute gave Godwine – a relative newcomer - in marriage to this high-ranking Danish woman whose brother had recently been killed by Canute’s orders.  This doesn’t sound like an auspicious beginning, and I wonder if the early years of their marriage weren’t a bit tempestuous.  Perhaps their first son was born in the midst of bitter recriminations?  This might explain Godwine’s stubborn defense of his wayward son in face of almost universal disapproval.  It was reported that during his second banishment, Swegn put it about that King Canute was his real father, which caused Gytha to strenuously and very publicly object.  What was the motivation behind this outrage?

The abbess of Leominster story has a possible explanation.  There is circumstantial evidence Eadgifu may have been related to the late Earl Hakon, nephew of King Canute.  She may possibly have been childhood friends with Swegn, and perhaps more: it seems highly unlikely he would have kidnapped such a high-profile total stranger.  The Worcester tradition states that he kept her for one year and wanted to marry her, but was forbidden by the church and commanded to return her to Leominster, which caused him to leave the country. 

As for Beorn, there seems little defence.  It has been said that it was Harold rather than Beorn that stubbornly refused to release the territory to Swegn, and this is why Swegn was able to persuade Beorn to accompany him to the King in Sandwich.  Regardless, Beorn must have been the victim of Swegn’s bad temper (at best) or revenge (at worst).  Swegn’s decision to go on pilgrimage seems to have been the last attempt to redeem himself.

It is said that Swegn died on his way back from Jerusalem exactly fourteen days after Godwine’s successful return to England.  By all reports, Swegn was mourned by no one except his father.  No one was to know it yet, but this was only the beginning of the end for the House of Godwine.

8 Responses to “Swegn Godwineson, Evil or Tragic?”

  1. [...] was not likely to give birth to an heir, thus reducing her own and Godwine’s influence.  Swegn, Godwine’s eldest son, had shamed the family by his outrageous behavior, then committed the [...]

  2. Interesting article; it’s a fascinating period that deserves more study. With the paucity of records it’s impossible to tell, isn’t it, but I think you make a good point that there’s a back story here. Afterall, Svein wasn’t the first notable to abduct someone from a nunnery; didn’t
    Edgar do the same?

  3. Do you mean Edgar Aetheling? Or another Edgar? Do tell!

  4. Johnny H says:

    Swegen was wild, alright, and seems to have wanted to disgrace his family, whether that be declaring Earl Godwin as not his father or in making an unholy alliance with the Welsh menace, king Gruffyd ap Llewelyn, with whom he launched armed raids into S.W.England?

    Harold seems to have disowned his brother Swegen after the murder of their cousin, Beorn, and not supported his kin even after the witan declared the wildman as a ‘nithing’ and exiled him?

    I wonder how Swegen would have affected future events had he not died in 1052?

    For the record, it was Edmund Ironside that abducted a lady from a nunnery, in 1015/6, against his ailing father’s wishes. He was resisting the ravages of Canute at the time.

  5. Since Swegn apparently accompanied Godwine to Flanders during their exile, I assume there was some kind of rapproachment. Although since Harold went to Ireland, it stands to reason he might not have participated in the cozy family reunion. I wonder how Tostig felt?

    Thanks for setting the record straight about Edmund Ironside. I had forgotten that episode. Once again, considering his character, the was the lady in question someone he had a romantic relationship with?

  6. Johnny H says:

    In early September 1015 Edmund, Æthelred’s eldest surviving son by his first wife, seized lady Aldgyth and, in defiance of his father, freed her and married her, retaking her two dead brother’s vast estates and the ‘people’ (magnates and nobles) submitted to him (by force or threats?).

    Between the 15th of August and the 8th of September, says Florence, Edmund:
    “… went to the people of the Five Burghs, invaded the possessions of Sigeferth and Morcar, and brought the inhabitants thereof under his own dominion.”

    Previously, Æthelred had ordered that Aldgyth, the widow of Sigeferth and niece of Aelfhelm, be taken captive and held at Malmesbury, thereby suggesting that the king was complicit and maybe ordered the two brother’s murders by Eadric Stroena’s treachery at a council meeting earlier that year?

  7. “Swegn was mourned by no one except his father” That’s really tragic.

    I love these old tales of Saxon Sussex and Bosham especially. It makes you realise that the pre-Conquest period isn’t really that much further away than the Norman period in Sussex (but it seems much further away for obvious reasons).

  8. Hi Mark. Bosham has a true magic about it and I envy your proximity to it! In many ways it feels like time has passed by your little village. Thanks for posting

Leave a Reply